THE CHILD AND YOUTH WELFARE CODE
Art. 3. Rights of the Child. - All children shall be entitled to the rights herein set forth without distinction as to legitimacy or illegitimacy, sex, social status, religion, political antecedents, and other factors.
(8) Every child has the right to protection against exploitation, improper influences, hazards, and other conditions or circumstances prejudicial to his physical, mental, emotional, social and moral development.
THIS IS A REMINDER TO ALL TEACHERS, ESPECIALLY TO THOSE WHO ARE VERY RUDE & IMPOLITE TO THEIR STUDENTS!!!
As explained in our phone conversation, the notification letter issued to Desmond was intended to inform and call his attention on proper haircut. The form PS 12 form from the office of Discipline was issued wrongly where it should have been only a "verbal warning" advice. PLease disregard the said notice.
This is to acknowledge the letter posted by Mr. & Mrs. Tubije..
Thanks.
alisse
- NOTICE TO THE PARENTS
|2009-10-18 13:17:43
Hi Mr. Moderator,
Please show the complete contents of our letter to Mr. Barrot, our refusal to sign the copy........
"In view of the foregoing, we, the parents of Desmond John, refused to sign the received copy of your notice."
Very truly yours,
Mr. & Mrs. Rogelio D. Tubije
alisse
- NOTICE TO THE PARENTS
|2009-10-18 13:08:52
Al-Khobar, KSA
18 October 2009
Mr. Gerardo L. Barrot
Prefect of Discipline
IPSA
AL-Khobar
Dear Mr. Barrot,
This refers to the” NOTICE TO THE PARENTS” (Form PS-12) dated 13 October 2009 sent through our son, Desmond John of Grade 6-Amiable.
We believe that our son doesn’t deserve a reprimand letter since the violation was just his first offense and he should be given a verbal advice instead. Going through your “NOTICE TO THE PARENTS”, the second paragraph quotes: “This notice serves as a WRITTEN WARNING for the said offense. Please refer to IPSA Student Handbook Chapter VII-School Discipline, Section 8, pages 29-30, Item No. I”. These provisions in the student handbook are irrelevant to the minor offense committed by our son which is 1st offense of Non- observance of prescribed haircut. Section 8 shall apply only to habitual tardiness and unexcused absences. The provisions on chapter VII of Sections 3, 4 and 5 are the applicable procedure and penalties on such offense. We stron...
alisse
- NOTICE TO THE PARENTS
|2009-10-18 13:01:56
This refers to the” NOTICE TO THE PARENTS” (Form PS-12) dated 13 October 2009 sent through our son, Desmond John of Grade 6-Amiable.
We believe that our son doesn’t deserve a reprimand letter since the violation was just his first offense and he should be given a verbal advice instead. Going through your “NOTICE TO THE PARENTS”, the second paragraph quotes: “This notice serves as a WRITTEN WARNING for the said offense. Please refer to IPSA Student Handbook Chapter VII-School Discipline, Section 8, pages 29-30, Item No. I”. These provisions in the student handbook are irrelevant to the minor offense committed by our son which is 1st offense of Non- observance of prescribed haircut. Section 8 shall apply only to habitual tardiness and unexcused absences. The provisions on chapter VII of Sections 3, 4 and 5 are the applicable procedure and penalties on such offense. We strongly suggest that the Form PS-12 be reviewed and revised to reflect the correct penalty for such infraction.
hi mr. moderator can you please show THE GRADE 5 POINTERS..... OK BYE NOW
Upper Elementary Dept. Faculty Reply: The pointers for the 2nd Quaterly Examination were already given to the pupils of the Upper Elementary Dept. in their respective class last Oct 14, 2009. Detailed pointers are not provided to the pupils because part of their training is to be more independent and responsible with regards to study habits.
